http://max-ambiguity.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] max-ambiguity.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ivyblossom 2008-04-15 04:15 pm (UTC)

That's what I assumed as well. An encyclopedia-type reference shouldn't contain analysis or new information. IT should simply organize the existing work in a way that makes it accessible to other scholars/readers. And I really don't see the need for weeping over it anywhere.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting