I haven't seen the item up for publication, and I presume you haven't either, so perhaps we're not in the best position to judge
Actually I have seen it. It's in the legal documents that both parties in the lawsuit turned in that was also publish online free to view by everyone. That's why I'm writing these comments firmly by authoritative voice because I've seen both parties arguments and the material that they used to support those arguments.
What I see is a strong case against RDR, and RDR contradicting and backpeddling in their statements.
JKR is emotional because she encouraged a fan that she thought she could trust to like her work. Steve asked to help her work on her own encyclopedia. JKR's reps said no, and then Steve went on to write his own encylopedia even though he previously told other people it was wrong to do so. What kind of fan does that?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 03:43 am (UTC)Actually I have seen it. It's in the legal documents that both parties in the lawsuit turned in that was also publish online free to view by everyone. That's why I'm writing these comments firmly by authoritative voice because I've seen both parties arguments and the material that they used to support those arguments.
What I see is a strong case against RDR, and RDR contradicting and backpeddling in their statements.
JKR is emotional because she encouraged a fan that she thought she could trust to like her work. Steve asked to help her work on her own encyclopedia. JKR's reps said no, and then Steve went on to write his own encylopedia even though he previously told other people it was wrong to do so. What kind of fan does that?