Public Service Announcement
Aug. 17th, 2003 10:58 amIn case you didn't already know, the zine Manic Inquisitor publishes plagiarized stories. The short version: 'Sam Smith' likes to post stories under her name that were not written by her, and in spite of tremendous evidence that the stories are not hers to post, the administration refuses to remove the material and post an apology. In fact, Sam Smith is still listed as a 'staff writer'. Sam Smith 'writes' in a variety of fandoms, so you might want to check to see if she's written something of yours.
If anyone has donated to the zine via paypal, I strongly suggest you request the money back.
If anyone has donated to the zine via paypal, I strongly suggest you request the money back.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:12 am (UTC)well, great!
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:35 am (UTC)The Manic Inquistor handled this situation very very badly.
Malicia
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:42 am (UTC)They've handled this REMARKABLY badly, which is why I wanted to post about it and make sure as many people know about it as I can possibly tell.
As far as I'm concerned they're still handling it badly. Telling people "it's over now, stop talking about it" is NOT a great way to instill trust. It looks to me like they still don't understand how serious this is, and an apology from Sam Smith, while necessary, is not going to be enough. If she does not resign from their publication, they need to oust her.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:57 am (UTC)I see.
And yes they are not doing nearly enough. Personally I would not feel the least bit sorry if this totally ruins thier reputation. They did to themselves.
Malicia
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 08:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 10:01 am (UTC)No one's blaming them for not catching it in the first place. It's their chronic mismanagement and petty snipping that's the problem.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 12:43 pm (UTC)But I think it would be incredibly problematic if people who haven't paid attention to the details here walked away thinking that a week is always too long, or asking for some evidence from the author who claims another plagiarized is out of line.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 01:05 pm (UTC)Honestly, I think a week IS too long, once the evidence is in hand. They had clear evidence very fast, but accepted their staff writer's claim of 'hand written drafts' over a yahoo group post with the story in it from 2002.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 04:34 pm (UTC)<< And to date said person is still listed as a 'staff writer' and there has been no retraction or explanation on the website itself. >>
didn't they say on the apology that the plagarist was gonna make a public apology? just curious. perhaps they think (tho it's WRONG--she should be fired) that once she does so, she's forgiven.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-17 10:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 12:04 am (UTC)I swear, if companies started printing USE GOOGLE, YOU IDIOT on everyone’s monitors, all of these ridiculous problems could be solved in a heartbeat. (Not that I’m advocating Google as the means and ends of all information, but for something like this? C’mon.)
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-02 11:31 am (UTC)