I realize the porn industry has a ton of issues around abuse of women and drug use and so on and so forth, and on those grounds I have lots of issues with its production in certain contexts. But aside from those issues, what kind of damage does porn do to the family, exactly? How, pray tell, does legitimately produced porn hurt the children?
Please, Mr. Bush. I'm really waiting to hear.
Did you get whacked on the head with a porn video as a child?
Please, Mr. Bush. I'm really waiting to hear.
Did you get whacked on the head with a porn video as a child?
no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 10:21 pm (UTC)Yeah that could explain it! Maybe he got wacked on the head as a child with a porn vid by a gay person, who wanted to get married.
Or he could just be a dumb ass. As entertaining as the first option is I think I am going to vote for the dumb ass option.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 01:10 pm (UTC)*loves you randomly*
no subject
Date: 2003-11-02 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-03 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-04 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 12:13 am (UTC)*sigh*
Stupid president.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 12:14 am (UTC)Simple. It hurts the family and the children because we say it does! Honestly, if everyone just followed our moral code without question we wouldn't have a problem. Porn makes us uncomfortable, therefore porn is evil.
All your morals are belong to us.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 01:17 am (UTC)Other than extreme sarcasm, I have no idea. Tho I did write some smut just to spite Mr. Bush.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 05:38 am (UTC)In honor of Pornography Protection Week
Date: 2003-10-30 06:04 am (UTC)Porn can be damaging if it is the only source of sexual information a child receives. It warps the notion that sex can be something beautiful and meaningful. It reduces what should be a shared joy into mechanics. It reduces men to their dicks, and women to holes to shove those dicks into. It creates unrealistic body images in both male and female.
Pompeiian brothel paintings are NOT a good source of sexual education. Not when the guy is hung to his knees. Scared me to death, and turned me on at the same time. I was, shall we say, a bit disappointed by normal proportions.
As for the family: Porn can and does cause a lot of friction between spouses. A husband can get himself off quickly and easily with porn and not be interested in his wife. And when bed ain't right, ain't NOTHING right. Not every wife watches with him and says "cool, can we do that?" as I do. Many are repulsed. Some see it as a form of adultry.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 07:57 am (UTC)Anyway. Can't wait till he's out of office. I didn't even know what porn was until at least my freshman year of high school, so I don't know what he's talking about.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-30 02:53 pm (UTC)Why must we childeren be punished for the mistakes of our elders?
I think its obvious. Mr. Bush got whacked on the head with a porn video starring Sadam Hussien and other terriorists. Set in Iraq. With bombs in the backround.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-02 02:04 pm (UTC)I understand how. My Father has manic depression, and doesn't work. When we got an internet connected PC he started looking at some pretty disgusting stuff, and leaving the links on the history page and the task bar so my eight year old sister could find web pages with names like "hotwetpussysex". I think, coincidentally that it was "Harry Potter" she was typing in to get that one.
Yes, our PC is in a public room, not much help when he's home alone all day.
And yes, it did bother my sister. It was pretty disgusting stuff. The worst case was that an image became attached to the home page, which mercifully she didn't find, but very easily could have. We're talking about as bad as you get, without featuring animals or children.
And before you say it, this isn't a probem that only occurs in trailor parks. My father has a university education and a proffesional job. If you pass him on the street you don't think he's a pervert, tramp, waster or anything else. And some of the stuff he was viewing was legitimate.
If you ban the worst end of the legitimate porn though, it becomes that bit easier to neutralise the illegal things. And if serious porn, as opposed to just nude/underwear pics, is harder to get hold of, it puts a lot of people off. We never had a problem with Father being a pervert before the internet made it simple for him. On the net it's all just a click away.
I agree with you all the way that Bush is over-reacting, and I don't think banning porn is the answer. Personally I think banning Bush would sort out a fair number of problems. He's a prat who doesn't know what he's talking about and has simply latched onto a nice catchphrase. I also see he has a point though, even if I doubt that he understands his own point. For 99% of people, this isn't an issue. But 99% isn't everyone, and for the odd family, it is. The vice squad wouldn't have helped us any, but less porn on the internet, and less accessable hard porn would probably meant it never became an issue anyway. There still would have been more problems than you could shake a broom at, but that wouldn't have been one of them.
Conversly, I don't think slash fan fiction is a problem at all. Writen porn is never going to have the shock value that images have, and neither is porn drawn with a pencil. Photographic images however need some kind of regulation.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-02 02:10 pm (UTC)